Vaccines and New Jersey Custody Disputes

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Aug 10, 2021 | 0 Comments

After a divorce, parents often disagree on some of the big issues facing their children as they grow. Some of the biggest disputes can happen over medical decisions, including whether to vaccinate. Now, with COVID vaccines approved for children 12 and over, parents all over New Jersey are facing a vaccination decision before school begins in the fall. So, what happens when parents disagree about vaccinations?

New Jersey Legal Custody Disputes

In some cases, New Jersey courts can compel one parent to cede to their co-parent's wish to vaccinate, even if they disagree. In many cases, New Jersey parents share joint physical and legal custody over their children, meaning they share parenting time, and they must make decisions about their children's medical choices jointly. When parents disagree on major decisions, they can ask the court to step in.

A good example of how courts make these decisions is the case of M.A. v. A.A. See No. A-1493-20 (N.J. Super. June 30, 2021). In that case, the parents divorced in New Jersey in 2018, sharing joint physical and legal custody of their daughter, who was born in 2013. In their marital settlement agreement (MSA), both parties agreed that “their daughter's best interest is paramount.” However, the MSA didn't address vaccination or religious beliefs, and it failed to describe how the parties would resolve disputes regarding a medical emergency.

Religious Exemptions

Before the parties divorced, they jointly submitted a vaccine exemption form to their daughter's preschool based on their stated religious beliefs. They submitted a similar form to the local board of education for their daughter after their divorce. However, in 2019, after stepping on a rusty nail, the daughter received the diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis (DTaP) vaccine and had no adverse reactions. Parent one advised parent two about the vaccine. A few weeks later, when parent two and the child were to travel out of the country, parent one objected because they hadn't fully vaccinated their child. Although parent one filed a motion to prevent parent two from taking the child out of the country, the court denied it because the couple had previously vacationed out of the country with their unvaccinated daughter. But when the daughter returned, parent one took her to the doctor for follow-up vaccinations without parent two's knowledge. Their daughter developed a rash on her back.

The Vaccine Dispute

In response, parent two filed for sole custody of the daughter and moved to enjoin parent one from vaccinating their child in the future, claiming a religious objection. The court denied the motion to enjoin further vaccines and appointed parent one as “the limited medical guardian of vaccinations for their daughter.” The court held that having parent one make this decision alone was in their daughter's best interest and that the benefits of vaccines outweighed any potential risks. The court also held that the parent opposing vaccination wasn't sincere in her religious objection and lacked credibility.

While courts will mandate vaccinations in some situations, ruling in favor of vaccination isn't a hard and fast rule. Rather, the New Jersey family courts will decide the best interests of the child, considering the facts and circumstances of each case. If you're involved in a New Jersey custody dispute, call attorney Joseph D. Lento at 888-535-3686. Or contact the Lento Law Firm online.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Attorney Joseph D. Lento is a veteran of one of the nation's busiest family courts with nearly 20 years' experience passionately helping families. By day, he worked in the trenches of family court, and at night, he studied the law. He helped countless families while working at family court, and he went on to become an attorney, dedicating his law practice to continuing the work he started years earlier. Mr. Lento's experience both behind the scenes and on the front lines allows him to understand a client's family law matter from all angles, and allows him to find and employ the most effective strategies to get favorable outcomes for any client. Joseph D. Lento is licensed in New Jersey and New York, and is admitted pro hac vice as needed nationwide. In the courtroom and in life, attorney Joseph D. Lento stands up when the bell rings! He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and protects their interests.


There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact a Family Law Attorney Today!

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience practicing Family Law in New Jersey. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you and your family, contact our offices today. Family Law Attorney Joseph Lento will go above and beyond the needs for any client and fight for what is fair.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations - the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Allegheny, Berks, Bucks, Carbon, Chester, Dauphin, Delaware, Lancaster, Lehigh, Monroe, Montgomery, Northampton, Schuylkill, and York County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.