Blog

Children Testifying in Child Custody Cases

Posted by Joseph D. Lento | Feb 28, 2020 | 0 Comments

A huge dilemma that both family law attorneys and parents face in custody cases is whether a child should testify in custody proceedings. Some parents long to protect their child from the court process regardless of the circumstances, while others want their child's voice to be heard - particularly if the child is compelled to tell their story. 

What the Law Says

In New Jersey, judges are granted a great deal of discretion when deciding whether a child's testimony is allowed. Testimony from children isn't conducted at a podium in a courtroom like the movies suggest. It is given through an on-camera interview. 

Statutory laws (N.J.S.A. 5:8-6) specifically address children's testimony. It states the following:

“As part of the custody hearing, the court may on its own motion or at the request of a litigant conduct an in-camera interview with the child(ren). In the absence of good cause, the decision to conduct an interview shall be made before trial. If the court elects not to conduct an interview, it shall place its reasons on the record. If the court elects to conduct an interview, it shall afford counsel the opportunity to submit questions for the court's use during the interview and shall place on the record its reasons for not asking any question thus submitted.”

Simply put, the law says that a child could possibly be called to testify. But whether or not this happens will be determined based on the “best interests” of the child. A judge will take into account the child's maturity, intelligence, and ability to reason before putting him or her in a situation to testify.

Applying the Law

So, when is a child of reasonable intelligence and maturity to actually testify? New Jersey law doesn't have a specific criteria in regard to age. There is no “magic number” that judges can use to determine if a child's testimony is credible. Of course, the older the child is, the greater the possibility that a judge will allow the child to express a preference, but maturity and intelligence don't always come with age.

In my experience as a family law attorney, I've observed that judges prefer to keep children out of court proceedings. It is only when children beg to testify that a judge may be open to allowing it. For children like this, it may be even more traumatic to be barred from testifying, as they may feel disregarded and voiceless. Not to mention, that there are situations where it is completely necessary to call a child witness. If two parties have two separate accounts of events, sometimes the child is the only witness who can set the record straight. 

New Jersey Family Law Attorney

Overall, the decision to call a child to testify is a major one that should not be taken lightly. Child testimony has been known to make or break child custody cases. If you're on the fence about what your child should do, contact the Lento Law Firm today at 888-535-3686 for legal counsel.

About the Author

Joseph D. Lento

"I pride myself on having heart and driving hard to get results!" Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience advocating for his Family Law clients in courtrooms in New Jersey as well as Pennsylvania. He does not settle for the easiest outcome, and instead prioritizes his clients' needs and protects their interests.

Comments

There are no comments for this post. Be the first and Add your Comment below.

Leave a Comment

Contact a Family Law Attorney Today!

Slide3.jpg

Attorney Joseph D. Lento has more than a decade of experience practicing Family Law in New Jersey. If you are having any uncertainties about what the future may hold for you and your family, contact our offices today. Family Law Attorney Joseph Lento will go above and beyond the needs for any client and fight for what is fair.

This website was created only for general information purposes. It is not intended to be construed as legal advice for any situation. Only a direct consultation with a licensed Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York attorney can provide you with formal legal counsel based on the unique details surrounding your situation. The pages on this website may contain links and contact information for third party organizations – the Lento Law Firm does not necessarily endorse these organizations nor the materials contained on their website. In Pennsylvania, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout Pennsylvania's 67 counties, including, but not limited to Philadelphia, Bucks, Chester, Delaware, Montgomery, Berks, Lancaster, Lehigh, and Northampton County. In New Jersey, attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New Jersey's 21 counties: Atlantic, Bergen, Burlington, Camden, Cape May, Cumberland, Essex, Gloucester, Hudson, Hunterdon, Mercer, Middlesex, Monmouth, Morris, Ocean, Passaic, Salem, Somerset, Sussex, Union, and Warren County, In New York, Attorney Joseph D. Lento represents clients throughout New York's 62 counties. Outside of Pennsylvania, New Jersey, and New York, unless attorney Joseph D. Lento is admitted pro hac vice if needed, his assistance may not constitute legal advice or the practice of law. The decision to hire an attorney in Philadelphia, the Pennsylvania counties, New Jersey, New York, or nationwide should not be made solely on the strength of an advertisement. We invite you to contact the Lento Law Firm directly to inquire about our specific qualifications and experience. Communicating with the Lento Law Firm by email, phone, or fax does not create an attorney-client relationship. The Lento Law Firm will serve as your official legal counsel upon a formal agreement from both parties. Any information sent to the Lento Law Firm before an attorney-client relationship is made is done on a non-confidential basis.

Menu